What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
Just noticed that there are seperate pages for actually the same beast. Wouldnt it make more sense to just add a second image to one page? The only troops that should stay on their own are the pyroclastics (due to different skills).
What do you think about that?
umm..hey everyone. There happens to be a lot of discussion about what should and shouldn't happen in this wiki. And I know that there is lot of room for improvement around here. I would like to hear it from everyone what changes you'd like to see in the wiki and why.
But remember, the suggestions ought to have a good reason.
I hope to see many of your ideas on the what you'd like to see happen. I'd also appreciate your thoughts on other ideas and suggestions. Thanks for you contribution..
-Frost
The wiki is pretty much alright in most places. We still have to do the battles and enemies though.. the rest are pretty fine... i guess.
I'm thinking of changing the format of the heroes pages..they ought to show a lot more that simply the in-game description of the hero and his skills. We ought to add more description to the active skills and also add info about the critical hit patterns and stats...
The thing is that i'm not much good at creating and maintaining templates..
And so, I have been thinking.. we might need an extra admin in the wiki.
...I decided to choose the 2nd ranked contributer in the wiki. He also seems pretty good with templates. I hope nobody has any problems with me choosing user TheSench for the new admin position.
-Frost
With the newest update, a lot of changes have occured to most heroes.. There might be a need to revise the hero attack ranges, tips and tactics in the Heroes pages.
Sadly, still being unable to play the game, I cannot be of much help... So, I hope you guys can take care of it..
We also need to add pages on 'Holiday village' and the new units once more info comes out..
Just realized something being introduced to the newer heroes (i.e Runebinder). Let me just use his text from his wiki page for his battle skill, Runestone:
The problem that I think we are now faced with is the introduction of the skill changing ranks at each level. So, should we document this? I believe so as it's pertinent to the strategy of hero building. If we agree, then next is how to document this info. "{Rank R}" is no longer an efficient way to show the rank of a skill anymore. We need to come up with a new way to show rank with respect to level. Ideas?
Hey all,
just noticed that there are some places where it is talked about an attack or break pattern. The section behind is just left blank.
What about creating a template or a table to simply mark the attacks pattern? If this would be done, we should make clear in advance how this should look to make shure all pages look the same. What do you think about this?
I've been thinking of all the work needed now on the wiki..
-> Work on Enemy Pages..
-> Battle pages (all 216 of them.. i think..)
-> Pages about stuff like Stats, Leveling ,The Shop etc..
-> Beginner's guide
-> Revision of facts and numbers..
-> Addition of info to current pages..
-> More info on Limit breaks of each hero..
The efficient way of doing this would be by assigning each to different user(s). So, anyone willing to help? Give me a reply.. I'll be happy if you would hold on to bit of the heavy load...
as most of you might know, we have started work on the enemy pages... I would really like to know your opinion on the format of the page..
Is there something more we should add? or something we should remove or change? Please let me know..
http://lionheart-tactics.wikia.com/wiki/Bandit_Sniper ...umm, go look at the comments.
Hello,
I just thought about adding a section for campaign-enemys to the wiki. It could contain the enemys, for each of them: Race, Batlle Skill etc. similar to the heroes section.
Also useful tactics against them would fit in there.
What do you think about this? Would also be willing to help by e.g. creating wiki pages